Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 08:20
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Does believing in God and Satan cause schizophrenia?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Have you ever dealt with a Christian narcissist?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why does Boko Haram attack its own Muslims?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Shark Attack: “Jaws” Remains as Entertaining as It Was 50 Years Ago - Roger Ebert
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
George Clooney Reveals His Wife Amal’s Reaction When He Came Home With His New Hair - HuffPost
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.